Here is the live table for Harvey alternatives, prices checked 13 Nov 2026. See the table →Get price alerts
AI tools, scored for your job
Get paid to train AI
Updated 13 Nov 2026 · prices read on vendor pages

11 best Harvey alternatives in 2027

Mehmet ElmicenniReviewed by Mehmet Elmicenni, founder of Zekai•Prices checked •How we check

The short answer

The best Harvey alternatives in 2027 are CoCounsel (best overall), Genie AI (best free plan: Limited AI tokens, exports locked) and claude-legal-skill (best open source, MIT). Harvey: Sold by quote only; no public price on harvey.ai. Zekai checked these prices on vendor pages on 13 Nov 2026; 8 more are compared below, including 2 open source.

Open the Zekai Cost Finder Get price alerts
Best overallSee in table →
CoCounsel logo

CoCounsel

No public price on Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal page.

9.0
Best free planSee in table →
Genie AI logo

Genie AI

$59/mo billed yearly · free plan

7.3
Best open sourceSee in table →
claude-legal-skill logo

claude-legal-skill

Free to self-host · MIT

6.1
11alternatives compared
1with a free plan
3open source
$59/mo billed yearlycheapest paid · Genie AI
Sold by quote only; no public price on harvey.ai.Harvey starts at
01 · Zekai Price Ledger

Which Harvey alternatives are worth it in 2027?

The Harvey alternatives worth considering in 2027 are CoCounsel for Westlaw-grounded research, Legora for an agent-based workspace, Spellbook for contract drafting in Word and vLex Vincent for case-law research. Paxton AI and GC AI publish per-seat prices. Open-source options include claude-legal-skill, Prism Legal OS and Lavern. Prices were read on 11 November 2026.

ToolTypeStarting priceFree plan limitBest forCost for your teamChecked
Harvey logo
HarveyThe tool you are replacing
 You are here
Sold by quote only; no public price on harvey.ai.Not published; demo request only
 No free plan AI platform for law firms and legal teams — 13 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
CoCounsel logo
CoCounsel Zekai score 9.0Best overall
No public price on Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal page.
 No free plan Research grounded in Westlaw content — 13 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Legora logo
Legora Zekai score 6.4
Not checked
 No free plan Collaborative AI workspace for law firms — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Spellbook logo
Spellbook Zekai score 8.4
Not checked
 No free plan Contract drafting inside Microsoft Word — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
vLex Vincent logo
vLex Vincent Zekai score 8.8
Not checked
 No free plan Research on Clio's global legal database — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
LEGALFLY logo
LEGALFLY Zekai score 6.1
Not checked
 No free plan Regulated enterprises needing on-premise hosting — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Paxton AI logo
Paxton AI Zekai score 5.5
$250/mo billed yearlyIndividual, $2,999 per user per year ($499 per user monthly); 7-day trial
 No free plan Solo lawyers wanting published per-seat pricing — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
GC AI logo
GC AI Zekai score 7.5
$417/mo billed yearlyIndividual, $5,000 per year ($500/mo billed monthly); 14-day trial
 No free plan In-house counsel wanting a self-serve seat — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Genie AI logo
Genie AI Zekai score 7.3Best free planCheapest paid
 Free plan + paid
$59/mo billed yearlyPro, billed annually ($708/year); $75/mo billed monthly
 Limited AI tokens, exports locked Low-cost contract drafting with a free tier — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Lavern logo
Lavern Zekai score 6.6
 Open source
Free (self-hosted)
 No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0) Multi-agent document review reference build $0 11 Nov 2026 Code ↗

Every price was read on the vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. The Cost Finder assumes one entry plan per person, so it multiplies by your team size; yearly prices are shown per month, and team or business plans can cost more per seat. "Not checked" means we could not confirm a public price.

Price alert

Know first when Harvey or an alternative changes price

One email when a price or free plan on this page changes, plus The AI Briefing. Unsubscribe any time.

Alternatives Spotlight

Your tool here

One labelled card beside this table, outside the ranking.

Advertise here
For vendors

Is one of these tools yours?

Claim your listing to correct prices and free-plan limits.

Claim your tool
02 · Free plan

Is there a free version of Harvey?

Harvey does not publish a free plan or a free trial. Its website offers a demo request, and its pricing page lists no plan tiers, seat counts or prices, so cost is quoted by its sales team. Free options among alternatives include Genie AI's Free plan and short trials from Spellbook, Paxton AI and GC AI.

Source: Harvey pricing page, read 13 Nov 2026.

FreeNone

No free plan on the pricing page

Paid fromSold by quote only; no public price on harvey.ai.

Not published; demo request only

03 · Free alternatives

What are the best free Harvey alternatives?

The best free Harvey alternative is Genie AI, whose Free plan gives limited AI tokens with exports locked until you upgrade; Pro starts at $59 a month billed yearly. Spellbook, Paxton AI and GC AI offer free trials of 7 to 14 days instead. Harvey itself has no free plan and takes demo requests only.

Genie AI logo

Genie AI

Best free planCheapest paidFree plan + paid
Limited AI tokens, exports locked
Paid from $59/mo billed yearly
vs Harvey →Zekai review
04 · Open source

What are the best open-source Harvey alternatives?

The best open-source Harvey alternatives are claude-legal-skill (MIT, a contract review skill), Prism Legal OS (AGPL-3.0, a self-hosted legal workspace using Docker Compose) and Lavern (Apache-2.0, a multi-agent document review system). The repositories state these licences; none offers the managed security certifications or legal databases of commercial platforms.

Lavern logo

Lavern

Apache-2.0★ 311 GitHub stars · Sep 2026
To self-host: Node.js and npm install; demo and local mode need no keys, real reviews need an Anthropic or Mistral API key, or Ollama for fully local models.
Zekai open-source pageSource code ↗Managed hosting slot
05 · Side by side

How does Harvey compare with each alternative?

Harvey groups an Assistant, Vault, Knowledge research, Workflows and a Word add-in, and publishes no prices. CoCounsel is grounded in Westlaw content, Legora adds an agent and monitors, Spellbook focuses on Word drafting, Paxton AI lists $2,999 per user yearly, GC AI lists $5,000 yearly, and Genie AI starts free.

01
CoCounsel logo

Harvey vs CoCounsel

Best overallNo public price on Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal page.9.0
The differenceThomson Reuters product that answers research, analysis and drafting queries grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law content, sold to law firms, businesses and government.
Switch to CoCounsel ifyou want research answers anchored to Westlaw and Practical Law content you may already license
Stay with Harvey ifyou want a platform with a document Vault, workflow builder and Word add-in in one place
Cons
  • Pricing is not transparent and requires scheduling a sales demo.
  • Effectiveness for highly novel or niche legal issues may vary.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of CoCounsel · Verdict: A secure, lawyer-built AI

Visit CoCounselRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
02
Legora logo

Harvey vs Legora

Not checked6.4
The differenceOffers an Agent for end-to-end legal tasks, Monitors that scan regulation, plus Word and Outlook add-ins, and lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 certifications.
Switch to Legora ifyou want an agent plus Outlook and Word add-ins and regulation monitoring in one workspace
Stay with Harvey ifyou want Harvey's Vault for bulk document analysis and its custom agents inside Word
Pros
  • Unified 'operating system' approach combines multiple legal tasks, reducing tool fragmentation.
  • Agentic AI handles complex workflows from intake to delivery, not just single tasks.
Cons
  • Pricing is not transparent and requires a demo, suggesting a high cost of entry.
  • As a comprehensive 'operating system,' it may have a steep learning curve and require significant process change.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Legora · Verdict: Agentic Legal OS

Visit LegoraRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
03
Spellbook logo

Harvey vs Spellbook

Not checked8.4
The differenceCentres on a Word Add-In and an Associate agent for contract work, with a self-serve 7-day free trial and pricing set by the number of team members licensed.
Switch to Spellbook ifyou mainly draft and review contracts in Word and want a short self-serve trial first
Stay with Harvey ifyou need research across legal, regulatory and tax questions as well as contract drafting
Pros
  • Streamlines contract review process, saving time and reducing errors
  • Enables lawyers to generate initial drafts of contracts, such as NDAs and MSAs, in moments
Cons
  • Limited to Microsoft Word integration, may not be compatible with other document management systems
  • May require significant upfront investment in training and implementation

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Spellbook

Visit SpellbookRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
04
vLex Vincent logo

Harvey vs vLex Vincent

Not checked8.8
The differenceCombines Clio's global legal database with AI for cited research, multi-state surveys, jurisdiction comparisons and judge and party profiles from court records.
Switch to vLex Vincent ifyou need jurisdiction comparisons and litigation intelligence drawn from a large case-law database
Stay with Harvey ifyou want contract review and bulk document analysis more than a case-law research database
Pros
  • Access to over one billion legal documents from 100+ countries.
  • SOC2 and ISO 27001 certified, ensuring enterprise-grade data security.
Cons
  • Pricing is not transparent and requires a demo, suggesting a premium cost.
  • Advanced custom workflow features (Vincent Studio) are limited to Enterprise customers.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of vLex Vincent · Verdict: Elite Legal Intelligence

Visit vLex VincentRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
05
LEGALFLY logo

Harvey vs LEGALFLY

Not checked6.1
The differenceOffers hosting as secure SaaS, single-tenancy or full on-premise at extra cost, with anonymisation and unlimited requests across its review, drafting, research and compliance agents.
Switch to LEGALFLY ifyou must host the legal AI on-premise or in a single-tenant environment
Stay with Harvey ifyou are comfortable with a standard cloud deployment and want to see it in a live demo first
Pros
  • Designed specifically for in-house corporate legal teams.
  • Offers end-to-end workflow automation, not just single tasks.
Cons
  • Pricing is not transparent and requires a sales demo.
  • Explicitly not designed for law firm productivity workflows.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of LEGALFLY · Verdict: Enterprise Legal OS

Visit LEGALFLYRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
06
Paxton AI logo

Harvey vs Paxton AI

$250/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20265.5
The differencePublishes its Individual plan at $499 per user monthly or $2,999 per user yearly, with a 7-day free trial and custom Enterprise pricing.
Switch to Paxton AI ifyou are a solo lawyer or small team and want a published per-user price you can compare
Stay with Harvey ifyou are a firm that needs the enterprise integrations and custom workflows a sales-led contract provides
Pros
  • All-in-one platform for drafting, analysis, and research.
  • Access to US federal and state law across all 50 states.
Cons
  • High monthly subscription cost for individual users.
  • Does not replace a law firm or provide legal advice.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Paxton AI · Verdict: Comprehensive Legal AI Assistant

Visit Paxton AIRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
07
GC AI logo

Harvey vs GC AI

$417/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20267.5
The differenceSells a single-seat Individual plan at $500 monthly or $5,000 yearly after a 14-day trial with no card, and quotes Team plans on request.
Switch to GC AI ifyou are one in-house lawyer who wants to start alone on a 14-day trial without a card
Stay with Harvey ifyou are buying for a whole legal department and want a vendor-led rollout
Pros
  • Built by former General Counsel specifically for in-house teams.
  • SOC 2 Type II compliant with a no-model-training data policy.
Cons
  • Highly focused on in-house commercial work; may be less suited for litigation or other practice areas.
  • Pricing is not publicly listed, requiring a demo or sales contact.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of GC AI · Verdict: In-House Legal Accelerator

Visit GC AIRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
08
Genie AI logo

Harvey vs Genie AI

Best free planCheapest paidFree plan + paid$59/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20267.3
The differenceHas a Free plan with limited AI tokens and locked exports, a Pro plan at $75 monthly or $59 on annual billing, and a Business plan at $320 monthly.
Switch to Genie AI ifyou want a free or low-cost plan for drafting contracts rather than a sales-led platform
Stay with Harvey ifyou need research, a Vault and workflows at law-firm scale rather than a document-toolkit price tier
Pros
  • Purpose-built for legal workflows, not a repurposed chatbot.
  • Builds an 'organizational brain' by learning from your contracts and playbooks.
Cons
  • Full capabilities require initial setup of playbooks and standards.
  • Higher-tier features like unlimited tokens and custom agents are Enterprise-only.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Genie AI · Verdict: Purpose-Built Legal Powerhouse

Visit Genie AIRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
11
Lavern logo

Harvey vs Lavern

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.6
The differenceRuns 67 agent prompts that debate findings, requires cited document text for each finding and pauses critical decisions at a human approval gate; the authors call it a reference implementation.
Switch to Lavern ifyou want to experiment with a multi-agent review workflow that can run on local models
Stay with Harvey ifyou need a finished, supported product to put in front of clients
Visit LavernRead the Zekai reviewPrice alert
06 · What changed

Why do people leave Harvey?

  • Harvey's pricing page lists no plans, prices or seat minimums and offers only a demo request, so cost cannot be compared before speaking to sales. (source)

08 · FAQ

Questions people ask about Harvey alternatives

What is the best alternative to Harvey in 2027?

CoCounsel is the best overall Harvey alternative on this page (No public price on Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal page.). For no cost, Genie AI has a free plan (Limited AI tokens, exports locked). To self-host, claude-legal-skill is open source (MIT).

Is there a free version of Harvey?

No. Harvey has no free plan; paid plans start at Sold by quote only; no public price on harvey.ai., checked on 13 Nov 2026.

Is there a 100% free alternative to Harvey?

Yes. claude-legal-skill, Prism Legal OS, Lavern are open source and free to self-host. Genie AI has a free plan with limits, shown in the table.

How much do Harvey alternatives cost for a team of 5?

If each of 5 people buys the entry paid plan, at the prices Zekai checked on 13 Nov 2026, the monthly cost is Genie AI $295/mo, Paxton AI $1,250/mo, GC AI $2,083.35/mo. Team and business plans can cost more per seat. The Zekai Cost Finder on this page recalculates for any team size.

Which is better, CoCounsel or Harvey?

Thomson Reuters product that answers research, analysis and drafting queries grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law content, sold to law firms, businesses and government. Choose CoCounsel if you want research answers anchored to Westlaw and Practical Law content you may already license. Stay with Harvey if you want a platform with a document Vault, workflow builder and Word add-in in one place.

Why are people leaving Harvey?

The documented reasons are: Harvey's pricing page lists no plans, prices or seat minimums and offers only a demo request, so cost cannot be compared before speaking to sales (11 Nov 2026). Each is sourced in the section above.

What is better than Harvey?

It depends on the work: CoCounsel suits Westlaw-based research, Spellbook suits drafting in Word, and Legora suits teams wanting an agent-based workspace.

09 · Method

How did Zekai check this page?

Zekai independently reviews AI tools. For this page we read each vendor's own pricing and product pages and recorded the starting price, the free-plan limit and the date of the check. Only tools that do the same job as Harvey are listed, and sponsors never change the order or the scores.

Mehmet Elmicenni, founder of Zekai
Mehmet Elmicenni

Founder of Zekai. Reviews the alternatives pages and the price checks behind them.

About the founder · How Zekai scores tools

JSON copyMarkdown copy
1 · Same job onlyEvery alternative does the same task as Harvey; tools for other jobs are left out.
2 · Vendor pages onlyPrices and free limits come from each vendor's own pricing page, never from blogs.
Zekai score0–10, from four published weights: ease 25%, output quality 30%, value 20%, time saved 25%. How we score
3 · Re-checkedA price older than 35 days is re-read or the page falls back to an older version.
Change log

  • Page rebuilt on v6; all prices re-read on vendor pages.

  • Missing prices re-read on vendor pages.

Get paid to train AI →

See Zekai first in Google