You came from an AI answer. These are today's Runway alternative prices and free limits. See the table →Get price alerts
AI tools, scored for your job
Get paid to train AI
Updated 13 Nov 2026 · prices read on vendor pages

16 best Runway alternatives in 2027

Mehmet ElmicenniReviewed by Mehmet Elmicenni, founder of Zekai•Prices checked •How we check

The short answer

The best Runway alternatives in 2027 are Luma AI (best overall, $30/mo), LTX Studio (best free plan: 800 one-time credits) and ComfyUI (best open source, GPL-3.0). Runway itself starts at $15/mo. Zekai checked these prices on vendor pages on 11 Nov 2026; 13 more are compared below, including 2 with a free plan and 7 open source.

16alternatives compared
3with a free plan
8open source
$10/mocheapest paid · Pika
$15/moRunway starts at
01 · Zekai Price Ledger

Which Runway alternatives are worth it in 2027?

Runway's closest same-task rivals are Luma AI and Pika for hosted text-to-video, plus Moonvalley and LTX Studio for storyboard-style work. Pika has the lowest monthly entry price with a commercial licence. Open options such as ComfyUI and HunyuanVideo remove credits but need your own GPU hardware.

ToolTypeStarting priceFree plan limitBest forCost for your teamChecked
Runway logo
RunwayThe tool you are replacing
You are here
$15/moStandard, monthly
125 one-time credits Video generation plus editing in one studio — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Luma AI logo
Luma AI Zekai score 7.6Best overall
$30/moPlus, monthly
No free plan Dream Machine video with large credit pools — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Pika logo
Pika Zekai score 7.6Cheapest paid
Free plan + paid
$10/moStarter, monthly
No monthly credits; 2 parallel video generations Cheap entry plan for short clips — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
LTX Studio logo
LTX Studio Zekai score 7.8Best free plan
Free plan + paid
$15/moLite, monthly
800 credits one time, personal use only Storyboard-to-video with a free start — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Kling.ai logo
Kling.ai Zekai score 8.2
Free
Free plan; paid price not published
Cinematic clips from text or images $0 14 Nov 2026
Vidu logo
Vidu Zekai score 7.3
Not checked
No free plan Reference-based video clips — 14 Nov 2026
Minimax Hailuo logo
Minimax Hailuo Zekai score 6.8
Not checked
No free plan Fast image-to-video from Minimax — 14 Nov 2026
Moonvalley logo
Moonvalley Zekai score 7.0
$14.99/moStandard, monthly
No free plan Studio-oriented video clips — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Google Veo 3.1 logo
Google Veo 3.1 Zekai score 8.3
Not checked
No free plan Veo video inside Google AI plans — 14 Nov 2026
ComfyUI logo
ComfyUI Zekai score 8.1Best open source
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (GPL-3.0) Node-based local video workflows $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
Open-Generative-AI logo
Open-Generative-AI Zekai score 7.9
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (MIT) MIT-licensed studio for many models $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
HunyuanVideo logo
HunyuanVideo Zekai score 6.5
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (Tencent (not OSI-approved)) Open weights from Tencent, big GPU needed $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
Wan 2.2 logo
Wan 2.2 Zekai score 6.5
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0) Open Apache-2.0 weights for 720P video $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
LTX-Video logo
LTX-Video Zekai score 6.8
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0 (code)) Light open video model for local GPUs $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
CogVideoX logo
CogVideoX Zekai score 5.8
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0) Older open model with small-GPU options $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
FramePack logo
FramePack Zekai score 5.8
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0) Long clips from one image on 6GB $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
LongCat-Video logo
LongCat-Video Zekai score 6.8
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (MIT) MIT-licensed model for long video clips $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗

Every price was read on the vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. The Cost Finder assumes one entry plan per person, so it multiplies by your team size; yearly prices are shown per month, and team or business plans can cost more per seat. "Not checked" means we could not confirm a public price.

Price alert

Know first when Runway or an alternative changes price

One email when a price or free plan on this page changes, plus The AI Briefing. Unsubscribe any time.

Alternatives Spotlight

Your tool here

One labelled card beside this table, outside the ranking.

Advertise here
For vendors

Is one of these tools yours?

Claim your listing to correct prices and free-plan limits.

Claim your tool
02 · Free plan

Is there a free version of Runway?

Yes. Runway has a Free plan with 125 one-time credits and 5GB of asset storage, per its pricing page. The credits do not renew monthly, so the free plan works as a trial. Paid plans start at $15 a month on monthly billing, or $12 a month billed annually.

Source: Runway pricing page, read 11 Nov 2026.

Free$0

125 one-time credits

Paid from$15/mo

Standard, monthly

03 · Free alternatives

What are the best free Runway alternatives?

LTX Studio gives 800 one-time credits on a free plan, restricted to personal projects. Pika's free plan has no monthly credits, only paid credit packs, and 2 parallel video generations. Runway's own free plan gives 125 one-time credits. For ongoing free use, run open models locally through ComfyUI.

Pika logo

Pika

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid
No monthly credits; 2 parallel video generations
Paid from $10/mo
LTX Studio logo

LTX Studio

Best free planFree plan + paid
800 credits one time, personal use only
Paid from $15/mo
04 · Open source

What are the best open-source Runway alternatives?

Eight open-source options cover AI video: ComfyUI (GPL-3.0) and Open-Generative-AI (MIT) are front ends, while Wan 2.2, LTX-Video, CogVideoX, FramePack, LongCat-Video and HunyuanVideo are models. HunyuanVideo's licence excludes the EU, UK and South Korea. All run on your own GPU; FramePack asks for 6GB, Wan's large models 80GB.

ComfyUI logo

ComfyUI

GPL-3.0★ 146.7k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Needs a local GPU for most video models, Python and downloaded checkpoints; the desktop app and a manual install are both offered, and ComfyUI itself is free.
Commercial use
Yes; GPL-3.0 means sharing changes if you distribute a modified version.
Runs on
Desktop app or manual install; NVIDIA, AMD, Intel or Apple Silicon GPUs.
Setup
Moderate · Desktop app installs easily; workflows and model weights need setup.
Last commit
13 Nov 2026
Last release 10 Nov 2026
Open-Generative-AI logo

Open-Generative-AI

MIT★ 34.5k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Desktop installers for macOS, Windows and Linux; local video runs through a separate Wan2GP install needing Python, PyTorch and an NVIDIA or AMD GPU, or a Muapi.ai key.
Commercial use
Yes (MIT).
Runs on
Desktop app; local video needs a separate Wan2GP install and NVIDIA or AMD GPU.
Setup
Moderate · Desktop installers, then a Muapi.ai key or a separate local video install.
Last commit
12 Nov 2026
Last release 23 May 2026
HunyuanVideo logo

HunyuanVideo

Tencent (not OSI-approved)★ 12.8k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Linux with a CUDA NVIDIA GPU; the repo states a minimum of 60GB GPU memory for 720x1280 at 129 frames and recommends 80GB.
Commercial use
Conditional: excludes EU, UK and South Korea; licence needed above 100M monthly users.
Runs on
Linux with a CUDA NVIDIA GPU; 60GB minimum for 720x1280, 80GB recommended.
Setup
Hard · Linux, CUDA and 60GB-class GPU memory, plus large weight downloads.
Last commit
8 Oct 2026
Wan 2.2 logo

Wan 2.2

Apache-2.0★ 18.6k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Clone the repo, use PyTorch 2.4 or later and download weights from Hugging Face or ModelScope. TI2V-5B needs a 24GB GPU; the A14B models need at least 80GB.
Commercial use
Yes (Apache-2.0); the authors claim no rights over your generated content.
Runs on
5B model needs one 24GB GPU; the A14B models need at least 80GB VRAM.
Setup
Hard · Python install, PyTorch 2.4 or later and large weight downloads.
Last commit
21 Sep 2026
LTX-Video logo

LTX-Video

Apache-2.0 (code)★ 11.4k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Python 3.10 with CUDA 12.2 and PyTorch 2.1.2 or later, installed with pip; weights come from Hugging Face. The 2B models need less VRAM than the 13B ones.
Commercial use
Yes for the code; check the separate model licence for weights.
Runs on
CUDA GPU, Python 3.10, PyTorch 2.1.2 or later; 2B models need less VRAM.
Setup
Hard · Python and CUDA setup plus model downloads from Hugging Face.
Last commit
2 Nov 2026
CogVideoX logo

CogVideoX

Apache-2.0★ 13.2k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Python scripts using diffusers or the SAT toolkit, with weights from Hugging Face. The README lists about 4GB of VRAM for 2B and 5GB for 5B-I2V with optimisations.
Commercial use
Yes for the code and 2B weights; check the separate CogVideoX licence for 5B.
Runs on
GPU with 4GB VRAM minimum for the 2B model with optimisations; 5B needs more.
Setup
Hard · Python scripts with diffusers or SAT, and weights from Hugging Face.
Last commit
4 Nov 2025
Last release 8 Nov 2024
FramePack logo

FramePack

Apache-2.0★ 17.4k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Windows one-click package (CUDA 12.6) or Linux pip install; over 30GB of models download from Hugging Face. Needs an NVIDIA RTX 30, 40 or 50 series card, 6GB or more.
Commercial use
Yes (Apache-2.0).
Runs on
NVIDIA RTX 30, 40 or 50 series GPU, 6GB minimum; Windows or Linux.
Setup
Moderate · Windows one-click package, but over 30GB of models download.
Last commit
16 Oct 2025
Last release 18 Apr 2025
LongCat-Video logo

LongCat-Video

MIT★ 9.4k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Python environment with CUDA 12.4 PyTorch builds and FlashAttention-2; weights download separately. The README mentions multi-GPU runs and an int8 option for the avatar model; no VRAM figure.
Commercial use
Yes (MIT); the README says the model weights are MIT too.
Runs on
CUDA GPU with PyTorch (CUDA 12.4 builds) and FlashAttention-2; no VRAM figure stated.
Setup
Hard · Python environment, FlashAttention-2 and large weight downloads.
Last commit
27 May 2026
05 · Side by side

How does Runway compare with each alternative?

Runway's Standard plan costs $15 a month with 625 credits, Pro $35 with 2,250 credits, and Max $95 with 9,500 credits. Luma starts at $30 with 10,000 credits, Pika at $10 with 600 credits, and LTX Studio at $15 with 8,000 credits. Credits are not equal across tools, so compare models too.

01
Luma AI logo

Runway vs Luma AI

Best overall$30/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.6
The differenceLuma's Plus plan lists 10,000 credits a month with a commercial licence line, and its pricing page shows no free tier, while Runway offers a free plan with one-time credits.
Switch to Luma AI ifyou want a larger monthly credit pool at the entry paid tier and do not need a free trial.
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools, Brand Kits and custom voice clones on the same plan as generation.
Pros
  • Exceptional directorial control over video generation with the Ray 3.2 model.
  • Maintains visual consistency for characters and art styles via the Uni-1 model.
Cons
  • Credit-based pricing can be unpredictable and expensive for high-volume asset creation.
  • The complexity of multiple models and their varying credit costs requires a learning curve.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Luma AI · Verdict: Cinematic Game Asset Generation

02
Pika logo

Runway vs Pika

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid$10/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.6
The differencePika's Starter plan lists 600 credits a month with no watermark and a commercial licence, and its free plan has no monthly credits, only credit packs.
Switch to Pika ifyou want the lowest monthly entry price with a commercial licence and no watermark.
Stay with Runway ifyou need Runway's 4K upscaling, larger storage and models across image and video in one subscription.
Pros
  • Free tier available with 0 monthly credits and no commercial use.
  • Diverse set of creative tools for different video effects and transformations.
Cons
  • Complex credit system with varying costs per model, resolution, and duration.
  • Free plan is limited to 480p resolution for many features.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Pika · Verdict: Experimental AI Video Toolkit

03
LTX Studio logo

Runway vs LTX Studio

Best free planFree plan + paid$15/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.8
The differenceLTX Studio's free plan gives 800 one-time credits but restricts use to personal projects; commercial use starts at its Standard plan, while Runway's free credits are also one-time.
Switch to LTX Studio ifyou plan storyboard-style projects and want free credits to test before paying.
Stay with Runway ifyou need commercial use without stepping up to a higher plan and want Runway's wider model access.
Pros
  • Dramatically accelerates pre-production from script to storyboard
  • Maintains visual consistency with reusable AI elements
Cons
  • AI character consistency is promising but not always perfect
  • Web-based platform is desktop-only, lacking a mobile app

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of LTX Studio · Verdict: AI Pre-Production Powerhouse

04
Kling.ai logo

Runway vs Kling.ai

FreeFree plan; paid price not published8.2
The differenceKling AI is a video-generation service from Kuaishou with a separate developer platform and API; its consumer plan table did not load, so credits and limits here are unverified.
Switch to Kling.ai ifyou want Kling's own video models and its developer API instead of Runway's model lineup.
Stay with Runway ifyou want a plan table you can verify and Runway's editing suite alongside generation.
Pros
  • Outputs video in native 4K resolution, suitable for professional production pipelines.
  • Maintains character and vocal consistency across multiple scenes and clips.
Cons
  • As a new tool, the real-world reliability of its advanced features is not yet widely proven.
  • The advanced feature set suggests a potential learning curve for new users.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Kling.ai · Verdict: Cinema-Grade AI Video

05
Vidu logo

Runway vs Vidu

Not checked7.3
The differenceVidu sells subscription credits valid for 30 days, with separate purchased credits valid for 2 years, per its FAQ; plan prices did not load.
Switch to Vidu ifyou prefer buying purchased credits that last two years rather than monthly credits only.
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's rollover of unused credits on Max and its editing tools in one place.
Pros
  • Maintains character and object consistency using reference images.
  • Generates videos.
Cons
  • Maximum output resolution is 1080p, not suitable for 4K+ workflows.
  • Specific pricing for paid tiers is not publicly listed.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Vidu · Verdict: Consistent AI Character Video

06
Minimax Hailuo logo

Runway vs Minimax Hailuo

Not checked6.8
The differenceHailuo runs on MiniMax's own video models, and its subscribe page blocks automated reading, so no plan data could be checked.
Switch to Minimax Hailuo ifyou specifically want MiniMax's Hailuo models, which Runway does not host.
Stay with Runway ifyou want published plan limits and Runway's 4K upscaling and storage in one subscription.
Pros
  • Generates video from images, offering more control than text prompts.
  • Includes dedicated tools for specific effects like relighting and style transfer.
Cons
  • Lacks detailed pricing information on the website.
  • Appears focused on short clips, may not be suitable for longer sequences.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Minimax Hailuo · Verdict: Creative AI Clip Generator

07
Moonvalley logo

Runway vs Moonvalley

$14.99/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.0
The differenceMoonvalley's Standard plan lists 100 monthly credits for up to 10 videos at a monthly price, with no free tier shown on its pricing page.
Switch to Moonvalley ifyou want a plan counted in videos per month rather than credit pools.
Stay with Runway ifyou want a free tier to test with and Runway's larger credit allowance per month.
Pros
  • Unprecedented granular control over camera, motion, and character pose.
  • Trained exclusively on licensed data, ensuring output is commercially safe.
Cons
  • Pricing is not public and requires contacting sales, suggesting a high cost.
  • Steeper learning curve compared to simpler text-to-video tools.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Moonvalley · Verdict: Precise Cinematic Video Generation

08
Google Veo 3.1 logo

Runway vs Google Veo 3.1

Not checked8.3
The differenceVeo is reached through Google's AI plans and the Flow tool rather than a standalone video subscription; the plan page names a different video model, so no Veo price is stated here.
Switch to Google Veo 3.1 ifyou already pay for a Google AI plan and want Google's video model bundled with it.
Stay with Runway ifyou want a dedicated video studio with editing tools and credit-based plans that are video-specific.
Pros
  • Generates video and synchronized audio in one step.
  • Exceptional understanding of cinematic terms and camera movements.
Cons
  • Not a standalone application; accessed via Google platforms (Gemini, Flow).
  • Pricing and access model are not publicly detailed.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Google Veo 3.1 · Verdict: Cinematic AI Video

09
ComfyUI logo

Runway vs ComfyUI

Best open sourceOpen sourceFree (self-hosted)8.1
The differenceComfyUI is a node-graph interface that runs open video models locally under GPL-3.0, so there is no per-generation credit charge, but you supply the GPU and workflows.
Switch to ComfyUI ifyou have a capable GPU and want node-graph control over open video models with no credits.
Stay with Runway ifyou want hosted generation, no GPU setup and Runway's ready-made editing tools.
10
Open-Generative-AI logo

Runway vs Open-Generative-AI

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)7.9
The differenceOpen-Generative-AI is an MIT-licensed desktop studio that bundles local image models and can route video to Wan2GP or the Muapi.ai API, rather than a single proprietary model.
Switch to Open-Generative-AI ifyou want an MIT-licensed desktop studio that mixes local models with an optional API key.
Stay with Runway ifyou want one hosted subscription and do not want to install Python or manage GPU models.
11
HunyuanVideo logo

Runway vs HunyuanVideo

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.5
The differenceHunyuanVideo publishes open weights from Tencent, with a stated minimum of 60GB GPU memory for 720x1280 clips, so it targets server GPUs rather than laptops.
Switch to HunyuanVideo ifyou have an 80GB-class GPU and want open weights you can run and fine-tune yourself.
Stay with Runway ifyou need video generation from a browser without any datacentre-class hardware.
12
Wan 2.2 logo

Runway vs Wan 2.2

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.5
The differenceWan 2.2 ships Apache-2.0 weights for 480P and 720P video, with a 5B model that fits one 24GB GPU; Runway sells hosted generation with editing tools and no GPU to run.
Switch to Wan 2.2 ifyou have a 24GB or 80GB GPU and want Apache-2.0 weights with no credit limit
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools and upscaling without managing 80GB GPU jobs yourself
13
LTX-Video logo

Runway vs LTX-Video

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.8
The differenceLTX-Video is Apache-2.0 code with 2B and 13B model variants, and its README names LTX-2 as the primary successor; Runway sells hosted generation with editing tools and no GPU to run.
Switch to LTX-Video ifyou want a smaller open model family and can manage CUDA and Python yourself
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools and upscaling without managing CUDA and Python setups yourself
14
CogVideoX logo

Runway vs CogVideoX

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)5.8
The differenceCogVideoX has Apache-2.0 code and 2B weights, and its README lists about 4GB of VRAM for the 2B model with optimisations on; Runway sells hosted generation with editing tools and no GPU to run.
Switch to CogVideoX ifyou want an older open model with a 2B option that fits small GPUs
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools and upscaling without managing weight downloads and Python scripts yourself
15
FramePack logo

Runway vs FramePack

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)5.8
The differenceFramePack builds video from an image and prompt in sections, and its README says a 6GB GPU handles a one-minute clip; Runway sells hosted generation with editing tools and no GPU to run.
Switch to FramePack ifyou have an RTX card with 6GB or more and want long clips from a single image
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools and upscaling without managing a 30GB model download yourself
16
LongCat-Video logo

Runway vs LongCat-Video

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.8
The differenceLongCat-Video has MIT-licensed weights for text-to-video, image-to-video and video continuation, aimed at long clips; Runway sells hosted generation with editing tools and no GPU to run.
Switch to LongCat-Video ifyou want MIT-licensed weights for long clips and video continuation and can build FlashAttention yourself
Stay with Runway ifyou want Runway's editing tools and upscaling without managing FlashAttention builds and weight downloads yourself
06 · What changed

Why do people leave Runway?

  • Runway introduced a Max plan on 2026-06-01 that replaces the Unlimited plan, which is no longer offered; Max has 9,500 monthly credits and no Explore Mode, which Unlimited included. (source)

  • Runway's free plan is a one-time grant of 125 credits rather than a monthly allowance, so continued use needs a paid plan. (source)

08 · FAQ

Questions people ask about Runway alternatives

What is the best alternative to Runway in 2027?

Luma AI is the best overall Runway alternative on this page ($30/mo). For no cost, LTX Studio has a free plan (800 credits one time, personal use only). To self-host, ComfyUI is open source (GPL-3.0).

Is there a free version of Runway?

Yes. Runway has a free plan: 125 one-time credits. Paid plans start at $15/mo, checked on 11 Nov 2026.

Is there a 100% free alternative to Runway?

Yes. ComfyUI, Open-Generative-AI, HunyuanVideo, Wan 2.2, LTX-Video, CogVideoX, FramePack, LongCat-Video are open source and free to self-host. Pika, LTX Studio, Kling.ai have a free plan with limits, shown in the table.

What is cheaper than Runway?

Pika starts at $10/mo, against $15/mo for Runway, as listed on each vendor's pricing page on 11 Nov 2026.

How much do Runway alternatives cost for a team of 5?

If each of 5 people buys the entry paid plan, at the prices Zekai checked on 11 Nov 2026, the monthly cost is Pika $50/mo, Moonvalley $74.95/mo, LTX Studio $75/mo, against Runway $75/mo for Runway. Team and business plans can cost more per seat. The Zekai Cost Finder on this page recalculates for any team size.

Which is better, Luma AI or Runway?

Luma's Plus plan lists 10,000 credits a month with a commercial licence line, and its pricing page shows no free tier, while Runway offers a free plan with one-time credits. Choose Luma AI if you want a larger monthly credit pool at the entry paid tier and do not need a free trial. Stay with Runway if you want Runway's editing tools, Brand Kits and custom voice clones on the same plan as generation.

Why are people leaving Runway?

The documented reasons are: Runway introduced a Max plan on 2026-06-01 that replaces the Unlimited plan, which is no longer offered; Max has 9,500 monthly credits and no Explore Mode, which Unlimited included (1 Jun 2026); Runway's free plan is a one-time grant of 125 credits rather than a monthly allowance, so continued use needs a paid plan (11 Nov 2026). Each is sourced in the section above.

What is better than Runway?

It depends on the job. Luma AI and Pika are the closest hosted rivals for clip generation, while ComfyUI suits people who want to run open models on their own GPU.

09 · Method

How did Zekai check this page?

Zekai independently reviews AI tools. For this page we read each vendor's own pricing and product pages and recorded the starting price, the free-plan limit and the date of the check. Only tools that do the same job as Runway are listed, and sponsors never change the order or the scores.

1 · Same job onlyEvery alternative does the same task as Runway; tools for other jobs are left out.
2 · Vendor pages onlyPrices and free limits come from each vendor's own pricing page, never from blogs.
Zekai score0–10, from four published weights: ease 25%, output quality 30%, value 20%, time saved 25%. How we score
3 · Re-checkedA price older than 35 days is re-read or the page falls back to an older version.
Change log
  • Page rebuilt on v6; all prices re-read on vendor pages.

  • Open-source options expanded; each now shows licence, commercial use, hardware and setup.

Get paid to train AI →

See Zekai first in Google