Updated 13 Nov 2026 · prices read on vendor pages

15 best Turnitin alternatives in 2027

Reviewed by Mehmet Elmicenni, founder of Zekai•Prices checked 13 Nov 2026•How we check

The short answer

The best Turnitin alternatives in 2027 are Copyleaks (best overall, $13.99/mo billed yearly), Quetext (best free plan) and SlopTotal (best open source, MIT). Turnitin: Sold through sales contact; no public price on turnitin.com. Zekai checked these prices on vendor pages on 13 Nov 2026; 12 more are compared below, including 4 with a free plan and 6 open source.

Open the Zekai Cost Finder Get price alerts

Best overallSee in table →

Copyleaks

$13.99/mo billed yearly

6.6

Best free planSee in table →

Quetext

$14.99/mo · free plan

7.6

Best open sourceSee in table →

SlopTotal

Free to self-host · MIT

6.9

15alternatives compared

5with a free plan

7open source

$10/mo billed yearlycheapest paid · Winston AI

Sold through sales contact; no public price on turnitin.com.Turnitin starts at

01 · Zekai Price Ledger

Which Turnitin alternatives are worth it in 2027?

Worth considering in 2027: Copyleaks for self-serve plagiarism and AI checks, GPTZero for sentence highlighting and writing replay, Originality.ai for credit-based checks, Compilatio for multilingual institutions, and Binoculars for a self-hosted research detector. Turnitin itself has no public price and is sold to institutions by quote.

Zekai Cost Finder · team1 person

Tool	Type	Starting price	Free plan limit	Best for	Cost for your team	Checked
TurnitinThe tool you are replacing	You are here	Sold through sales contact; no public price on turnitin.com.Institutional quote only, no public price	No free plan	Institution-wide similarity and AI writing checks	—	13 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Copyleaks Zekai score 6.6Best overall	Paid	$13.99/mo billed yearlyPersonal, billed yearly ($16.99 billed monthly)	No free plan	Plagiarism and AI checks for individuals and schools	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
GPTZero Zekai score 6.3	Paid	Not checkedPrice not readable on vendor page today	No free plan	Sentence-level AI highlighting for teachers	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Originality.ai Zekai score 7.7Cheapest paid	Free plan + paid	$12.95/mo billed yearlyPro, billed yearly ($14.95 billed monthly)	10K words (100 credits), one-time	Publishers checking AI text and plagiarism	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Winston AI Zekai score 7.7	Free plan + paid	$10/mo billed yearlyEssential, billed yearly (list price; WINSTON50 code halves it)	2,000 credits over a 14-day trial	AI detection with certification for websites	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Quetext Zekai score 7.6Best free plan	Free plan + paid	$14.99/moEssential, from (monthly)	1,000 words each for plagiarism and AI checks	Students checking essays before submission	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Scribbr Zekai score 7.5	Free	Free plan; paid price not publishedPremium price not shown on vendor page today	Unlimited free AI checks (word cap not stated)	Students checking essays before submission	$0	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
PlagiarismCheck.org Zekai score 5.5	Paid	Not checkedQuote only (Advanced and Pro)	No free plan	Schools wanting quote-based plagiarism checks	—	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
Compilatio Zekai score 7.8	Free	Free plan; paid price not publishedInstitution quote or demo; no public price	First student analysis free, top 3 sources shown	European schools and universities	$0	11 Nov 2026	Pricing ↗
SlopTotal Zekai score 6.9Best open source	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (MIT)	Self-hosted multi-engine AI text detector	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
Binoculars Zekai score 3.5	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (BSD-3-Clause)	Research-grade zero-shot AI text detection	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
Dolos Zekai score 7.1	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (MIT)	Source-code plagiarism checks in programming courses	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
Fast-DetectGPT Zekai score 5.1	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (MIT)	Zero-shot detection from an ICLR 2024 paper	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
Open Detector Zekai score 6.4	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (MIT)	Academic-paper AI detection with a small model	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
SynthID Text Zekai score 6.3	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (Apache-2.0)	Watermark detection for text you generate	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗
JPlag Zekai score 7.3	Open source	Free (self-hosted)	No limit, self-hosted (GPL-3.0)	Source-code plagiarism checks across many languages	$0	13 Nov 2026	Code ↗

Every price was read on the vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. The Cost Finder assumes one entry plan per person, so it multiplies by your team size; yearly prices are shown per month, and team or business plans can cost more per seat. "Not checked" means we could not confirm a public price.

Price alert

Know first when Turnitin or an alternative changes price

One email when a price or free plan on this page changes, plus The AI Briefing. Unsubscribe any time.

Alternatives Spotlight

Your tool here

One labelled card beside this table, outside the ranking.

Advertise here

For vendors

Is one of these tools yours?

Claim your listing to correct prices and free-plan limits.

Claim your tool

02 · Free plan

Is there a free version of Turnitin?

No. Turnitin's product page lists no free plan or public price and directs visitors to contact sales; it is sold to institutions with LMS integration. Its AI writing detection is an Originality add-on and works in English only. Students wanting a free check can use tools such as Scribbr or Quetext.

Source: Turnitin pricing page, read 13 Nov 2026.

FreeNone

No free plan on the pricing page

Paid fromSold through sales contact; no public price on turnitin.com.

Institutional quote only, no public price

03 · Free alternatives

What are the best free Turnitin alternatives?

Scribbr advertises unlimited free AI checks, Quetext gives 1,000 words each for plagiarism and AI checks, Originality.ai gives a one-time 10K words, and Winston AI gives 2,000 credits over a 14-day trial. Compilatio gives students one free analysis showing the top three sources. Turnitin has no free plan listed.

Originality.ai

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid

10K words (100 credits), one-time

Paid from $12.95/mo billed yearly

vs Turnitin →Zekai review

Winston AI

Free plan + paid

2,000 credits over a 14-day trial

Paid from $10/mo billed yearly

vs Turnitin →Zekai review

Quetext

Best free planFree plan + paid

1,000 words each for plagiarism and AI checks

Paid from $14.99/mo

vs Turnitin →Zekai review

Scribbr

Free

Unlimited free AI checks (word cap not stated)

vs Turnitin →Zekai review

Compilatio

Free

First student analysis free, top 3 sources shown

vs Turnitin →Zekai review

04 · Open source

What are the best open-source Turnitin alternatives?

No open-source tool matches Turnitin's database of papers. For AI text, SlopTotal (MIT) runs 23 engines in Docker on a CPU; Fast-DetectGPT, Binoculars and Open Detector are Python models. For code, Dolos (MIT) and JPlag (GPL-3.0) compare student submissions with each other. SynthID Text detects only its own watermark.

SlopTotal

MIT★ 114 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Run docker run -p 8000:8000 ghcr.io/pablocaeg/sloptotal or the docker compose file; it detects your CPU, RAM and GPU at startup and needs about 8.3 GB of RAM for models.

Commercial use: Yes (MIT).
Runs on: Runs on CPU; loaded models need about 8.3 GB of RAM; GPU optional.
Setup: Moderate · One docker run command; models download on first start.
Last commit: 3 Nov 2026

Last release 3 Nov 2026

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

Binoculars

BSD-3-Clause★ 435 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Python 3.9 code that scores text with two Falcon-7B language models, so it needs a GPU or large-memory machine and downloaded model weights; the repo states no hardware figures.

Commercial use: Yes for the code (BSD-3-Clause); check the licence of the Falcon models you download.
Runs on: Python 3.9; two 7B models, so a GPU or large-memory machine.
Setup: Hard · Clone the repo, pip install, then download two 7B models.
Last commit: 14 May 2024

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

Dolos

MIT★ 357 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Self-host with docker-compose and prebuilt images, or run the CLI; v2.10.0 needs Node.js 22 or newer.

Commercial use: Yes (MIT).
Runs on: Node.js 22 or newer, or Docker; a free hosted web app also exists.
Setup: Easy · npm install -g @dodona/dolos gives a CLI; web hosting needs Docker.
Last commit: 12 Nov 2026

Last release 19 Oct 2026

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

Fast-DetectGPT

MIT★ 440 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Python scripts: run scripts/local_infer.py for an interactive demo with gpt-neo-2.7B, or pass gpt-j-6B as the sampling model; an online demo and API are at fastdetect.net.

Commercial use: Yes (MIT).
Runs on: Authors ran it on an 80 GB A100; the local demo defaults to gpt-neo-2.7B.
Setup: Hard · Python 3.8 and PyTorch 1.10 environment plus model downloads.
Last commit: 7 Feb 2026

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

Open Detector

MIT★ 254 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Install transformers and torch, then load followsci/bert-ai-text-detector from Hugging Face in a short Python script; text over 512 tokens is truncated, and it targets academic writing.

Commercial use: Yes (MIT); the Hugging Face model card also states MIT.
Runs on: Python with PyTorch and Transformers; BERT-base model, 512-token input.
Setup: Moderate · pip install transformers torch, then a short Python script.
Last commit: 12 Nov 2026

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

SynthID Text

Apache-2.0★ 1.3k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Install from PyPI or clone the repo and open the Colab or local Jupyter notebook; it watermarks Gemma 3 270M IT or GPT-2 text, then detects it.

Commercial use: Yes (Apache-2.0), but the repo calls itself a reference implementation, not for production.
Runs on: Any GPU such as a T4 for Gemma 3 270M; GPT-2 runs on CPU.
Setup: Moderate · Python virtual environment and a Jupyter notebook from the repo.
Last commit: 26 Oct 2026

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

JPlag

GPL-3.0★ 2k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026

To self-host: Download a released jar, or build with Maven, and run it on Java SE 25; the CLI opens a report viewer, and similarity is calculated locally.

Commercial use: Yes; GPL-3.0 means sharing source if you distribute changes.
Runs on: Java SE 25; runs locally, and no code or results are uploaded.
Setup: Moderate · Download a release jar and run it on Java 25.
Last commit: 5 Oct 2026

Last release 11 Dec 2025

Zekai open-source page Source code ↗Managed hosting slot

05 · Side by side

How does Turnitin compare with each alternative?

Copyleaks and Originality.ai sell self-serve credit plans, Quetext targets students, Compilatio serves multilingual institutions, GPTZero adds Writing Replay and PlagiarismCheck.org sells by quote. Turnitin is quote-only, adds a Similarity Report against a large student-paper collection and offers AI writing detection as English-only.

Turnitin vs Copyleaks

Best overallPaid$13.99/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20266.6

The differencePublishes self-serve prices by credit: Personal gives 100 credits a month (up to 25,000 words) and Pro $99.99 monthly for 1,000 credits; Education and Enterprise are by quote.

Switch to Copyleaks ifyou want to buy plagiarism and AI checks yourself by monthly credits instead of negotiating an institutional contract

Stay with Turnitin ifyour institution already runs submissions through its LMS and needs the Similarity Report workflow educators know

Pros

Combines AI detection and traditional plagiarism checking in one tool.
Provides specific model detection (e.g., GPT-3.5, GPT-4).

Cons

AI detection is probabilistic and can produce false positives on human writing.
False positives are more common for people writing in a second language.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Copyleaks · Verdict: Dual-purpose checker

Visit Copyleaks Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs GPTZero

PaidNot checked6.3

The differenceHighlights flagged sentences and lists the models it checks for; Writing Replay plays back how a document was typed, including paste activity, and a free Chrome extension covers Google Docs.

Switch to GPTZero ifyou want to see how a document was written through playback, not just a similarity score

Stay with Turnitin ifyou need a long-established similarity report against a large submission database and institutional LMS contracts

Pros

Simple interface: paste text or upload a file.
Provides a clear overall probability score.

Cons

Detection is probabilistic; it cannot be 100% certain.
Risk of false positives: can incorrectly flag human writing as AI.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of GPTZero · Verdict: Helpful, but fallible.

Visit GPTZero Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Originality.ai

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid$12.95/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20267.7

The differenceCharges one credit per 100 words, so an AI plus plagiarism scan uses two; Pro includes 200K words a month and 30-day scan history, with the API on Enterprise.

Switch to Originality.ai ifyou check web content for publication and prefer a transparent credit price per 100 words

Stay with Turnitin ifyou grade student work inside an LMS and need rubric and feedback tools alongside the check

Pros

Third-party studies validate its high accuracy
All-in-one suite: AI, plagiarism, fact-check, readability

Cons

Risk of false positives requires human review
The comprehensive feature set may be overkill for simple checks

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Originality.ai · Verdict: Comprehensive Content Integrity Suite

Visit Originality.ai Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Winston AI

Free plan + paid$10/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20267.7

The differenceEssential gives 100,000 credits a month and up to 200,000 characters per scan; its free tier is a 14-day trial, and a HUMN-1 certification is offered for website content.

Switch to Winston AI ifyou need a low-cost monthly plan with high per-scan character limits and website content certification

Stay with Turnitin ifyour school requires an institutional product integrated with its LMS and assignment workflow

Pros

Combines AI detection with plagiarism checking in one tool.
OCR function is a unique feature for scanning printed or handwritten work.

Cons

Detection is probabilistic and should not be treated as definitive proof.
Documented risk of false positives, which can unfairly affect non-native English speakers.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Winston AI · Verdict: A solid, indicative tool.

Visit Winston AI Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Quetext

Best free planFree plan + paid$14.99/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.6

The differenceEssential bundles plagiarism and AI detection at 100K words a month each with an AI humanizer and AITutorMe; Professional at $29.98 doubles to 200K words and 100 bulk-upload files.

Switch to Quetext ifyou are a student or writer who wants a self-serve pre-submission check with a small free allowance

Stay with Turnitin ifyour institution needs checks tied to LMS submissions and educator review of reports

Pros

Combines plagiarism and AI detection in one interface.
Clear visual feedback with color-coded highlighting.

Cons

AI detection is probabilistic and can produce false positives on genuine human writing.
Detection models may penalize people writing in a second language.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Quetext · Verdict: A dual-purpose checker.

Visit Quetext Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Scribbr

FreeFree plan; paid price not published7.5

The differenceThe AI detector page advertises unlimited free AI checks plus a Premium AI Detector tier with GPT-4 detection; Scribbr is built for students, not for institution-wide deployment.

Switch to Scribbr ifyou are a student who only needs a free AI check before handing in an essay

Stay with Turnitin ifyou are an educator who needs submission management, classes and similarity reports

Pros

Simple copy-and-paste interface is easy to use.

Cons

Detection is probabilistic and not 100% accurate; false positives are possible.
Can incorrectly flag human writing, especially from non-native English speakers.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Scribbr · Verdict: A cautious first opinion.

Visit Scribbr Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs PlagiarismCheck.org

PaidNot checked5.5

The differenceEducation plans are sold by quote only; Advanced supports an English, German, French, Portuguese or Spanish interface while Pro supports any language, and there is no public price list.

Switch to PlagiarismCheck.org ifyou want a smaller education vendor with a quote-based plan and a multilingual interface

Stay with Turnitin ifyour institution already holds a Turnitin contract and LMS integration it does not want to migrate

Pros

Combines plagiarism and AI detection in one tool
Integrates with common Learning Management Systems (LMS)

Cons

AI detection is probabilistic and can produce false positives on human writing.
False positives from AI detectors can disproportionately affect non-native English speakers.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of PlagiarismCheck.org · Verdict: Dual plagiarism & AI check

Visit PlagiarismCheck.org Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Compilatio

FreeFree plan; paid price not published7.8

The differenceMagister serves teachers and Studium lets students self-check; analysis covers more than 40 languages, and plagiarism and AI results appear in one report.

Switch to Compilatio ifyour school works in several languages, especially French, and wants plagiarism and AI results in one report

Stay with Turnitin ifyou want English-language AI writing detection from a vendor your LMS already integrates with

Pros

Combines AI detection and plagiarism checking in one tool.
Supports a wide range of languages.

Cons

AI detection is probabilistic; it can produce false positives on human writing.
Scores should never be the sole basis for academic sanctions or accusations.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Compilatio · Verdict: A dual plagiarism/AI check.

Visit Compilatio Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs SlopTotal

Best open sourceOpen sourceFree (self-hosted)6.9

The differenceRuns 23 detection engines, including Binoculars and Fast-DetectGPT, on your own CPU and returns one calibrated score with per-engine votes, file and URL scanning, and a JSON API.

Switch to SlopTotal ifyou want many detectors in one run and published accuracy data you can inspect

Stay with Turnitin ifyou want a hosted service with no Docker or server to look after

Visit SlopTotal Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Binoculars

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)3.5

The differenceA zero-shot AI-text detector from an ICML 2024 paper that needs no training data; it only scores AI likelihood and does no plagiarism matching, and the repo says academic use with human supervision.

Switch to Binoculars ifyou want to self-host an inspectable AI-text detector for research or your own tooling

Stay with Turnitin ifyou need plagiarism matching against a source database plus reports and LMS integration

Visit Binoculars Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Dolos

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)7.1

The differenceDetects source code plagiarism between submissions with similarity scores and a side-by-side compare view, but it checks code only and does not detect AI-written prose.

Switch to Dolos ifyou teach programming and need to compare student code submissions against each other

Stay with Turnitin ifyou grade essays and need prose similarity checks against web and publication sources

Visit Dolos Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Fast-DetectGPT

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)5.1

The differenceICLR 2024 zero-shot method using conditional probability curvature; the README reports 0.9887 AUROC on five-model generations and ships a local script, with no dashboard or upload.

Switch to Fast-DetectGPT ifyou plan to study or extend a zero-shot detector rather than only read scores

Stay with Turnitin ifyou need reports, accounts or an API with support behind it

Visit Fast-DetectGPT Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs Open Detector

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.4

The differenceBERT-base classifier trained for academic papers; the README claims 99.57% accuracy on its own dataset and says it is stylometric only. It is a model and script, not a web app.

Switch to Open Detector ifyou want a lightweight detector for research-style prose that stays offline

Stay with Turnitin ifyou need team accounts and support, not a model file

Visit Open Detector Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs SynthID Text

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.3

The differenceGoogle DeepMind reference code that detects only text carrying its SynthID watermark; the frequentist detector gives a binomial p-value for a key, so it cannot flag unwatermarked ChatGPT or Claude output.

Switch to SynthID Text ifyou want a statistical test tied to a key, not a style classifier

Stay with Turnitin ifyou need a score for text written by tools you do not control

Visit SynthID Text Read the Zekai review Price alert

Turnitin vs JPlag

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)7.3

The differenceFinds pairwise similarities among a set of programs and shows them in a report viewer; it compares source code in many languages and does not read essays or detect AI-written prose.

Switch to JPlag ifyou need software plagiarism and collusion checks across many programming languages, processed locally

Stay with Turnitin ifyou want similarity matching and AI writing checks in one hosted report for written work

Visit JPlag Read the Zekai review Price alert

06 · What changed

Why do people leave Turnitin?

11 Nov 2026
Turnitin lists no public pricing: the Feedback Studio page sends buyers to 'Speak to an expert', 'Schedule a call' or 'Contact Sales'. (source)
11 Nov 2026
Turnitin's AI writing detection is sold as the Originality add-on and, per its product page, is English only. (source)

08 · FAQ

Questions people ask about Turnitin alternatives

What is the best alternative to Turnitin in 2027?

Copyleaks is the best overall Turnitin alternative on this page ($13.99/mo billed yearly). For no cost, Quetext has a free plan (1,000 words each for plagiarism and AI checks). To self-host, SlopTotal is open source (MIT).

Is there a free version of Turnitin?

No. Turnitin has no free plan; paid plans start at Sold through sales contact; no public price on turnitin.com., checked on 13 Nov 2026.

Is there a 100% free alternative to Turnitin?

Yes. SlopTotal, Binoculars, Dolos, Fast-DetectGPT, Open Detector, SynthID Text, JPlag are open source and free to self-host. Originality.ai, Winston AI, Quetext, Scribbr, Compilatio have a free plan with limits, shown in the table.

How much do Turnitin alternatives cost for a team of 5?

If each of 5 people buys the entry paid plan, at the prices Zekai checked on 13 Nov 2026, the monthly cost is Winston AI $50/mo, Originality.ai $64.75/mo, Copyleaks $69.95/mo. Team and business plans can cost more per seat. The Zekai Cost Finder on this page recalculates for any team size.

Which is better, Copyleaks or Turnitin?

Publishes self-serve prices by credit: Personal gives 100 credits a month (up to 25,000 words) and Pro $99.99 monthly for 1,000 credits; Education and Enterprise are by quote. Choose Copyleaks if you want to buy plagiarism and AI checks yourself by monthly credits instead of negotiating an institutional contract. Stay with Turnitin if your institution already runs submissions through its LMS and needs the Similarity Report workflow educators know.

Why are people leaving Turnitin?

The documented reasons are: Turnitin lists no public pricing: the Feedback Studio page sends buyers to 'Speak to an expert', 'Schedule a call' or 'Contact Sales' (11 Nov 2026); Turnitin's AI writing detection is sold as the Originality add-on and, per its product page, is English only (11 Nov 2026). Each is sourced in the section above.

Turnitin vs GPTZero: what is the difference?

Turnitin pairs a Similarity Report with an AI writing add-on sold to institutions. GPTZero focuses on AI detection with sentence highlighting and Writing Replay, and also has plagiarism checking.

09 · Method

How did Zekai check this page?

Zekai independently reviews AI tools. For this page we read each vendor's own pricing and product pages and recorded the starting price, the free-plan limit and the date of the check. Only tools that do the same job as Turnitin are listed, and sponsors never change the order or the scores.

Mehmet Elmicenni

Founder of Zekai. Reviews the alternatives pages and the price checks behind them.

About the founder · How Zekai scores tools

JSON copy Markdown copy

1 · Same job onlyEvery alternative does the same task as Turnitin; tools for other jobs are left out.

2 · Vendor pages onlyPrices and free limits come from each vendor's own pricing page, never from blogs.

Zekai score0–10, from four published weights: ease 25%, output quality 30%, value 20%, time saved 25%. How we score

3 · Re-checkedA price older than 35 days is re-read or the page falls back to an older version.

Change log

11 Nov 2026
Page rebuilt on v6; all prices re-read on vendor pages.
13 Nov 2026
Missing prices re-read on vendor pages.
13 Nov 2026
Open-source options expanded; each now shows licence, commercial use, hardware and setup.

15 best Turnitin alternatives in 2027

Copyleaks

Quetext

SlopTotal

Which Turnitin alternatives are worth it in 2027?

Know first when Turnitin or an alternative changes price

Your tool here

Is one of these tools yours?

Is there a free version of Turnitin?

What are the best free Turnitin alternatives?

Originality.ai

Winston AI

Quetext

Scribbr

Compilatio

What are the best open-source Turnitin alternatives?

SlopTotal

Binoculars

Dolos

Fast-DetectGPT

Open Detector

SynthID Text

JPlag

How does Turnitin compare with each alternative?

Turnitin vs Copyleaks

Turnitin vs GPTZero

Turnitin vs Originality.ai

Turnitin vs Winston AI

Turnitin vs Quetext

Turnitin vs Scribbr

Turnitin vs PlagiarismCheck.org

Turnitin vs Compilatio

Turnitin vs SlopTotal

Turnitin vs Binoculars

Turnitin vs Dolos

Turnitin vs Fast-DetectGPT

Turnitin vs Open Detector

Turnitin vs SynthID Text

Turnitin vs JPlag

Why do people leave Turnitin?

More comparisons for AI content and plagiarism detector

Questions people ask about Turnitin alternatives

What is the best alternative to Turnitin in 2027?

Is there a free version of Turnitin?

Is there a 100% free alternative to Turnitin?

How much do Turnitin alternatives cost for a team of 5?

Which is better, Copyleaks or Turnitin?

Why are people leaving Turnitin?

Turnitin vs GPTZero: what is the difference?

How did Zekai check this page?