You came from an AI answer. These are today's Apollo.io alternative prices and free limits. See the table →Get price alerts
AI tools, scored for your job
Get paid to train AI
Updated 13 Nov 2026 · prices read on vendor pages

13 best Apollo.io alternatives in 2027

Mehmet ElmicenniReviewed by Mehmet Elmicenni, founder of Zekai•Prices checked •How we check

The short answer

The best Apollo.io alternatives in 2027 are ZoomInfo (best overall), Hunter (best free plan: 50 credits a month) and OpenOutreach (best open source, GPL-3.0). Apollo.io itself starts at $49/mo. Zekai checked these prices on vendor pages on 13 Nov 2026; 10 more are compared below, including 4 with a free plan and 3 open source.

13alternatives compared
5with a free plan
4open source
$34/mo billed yearlycheapest paid · Hunter
$49/moApollo.io starts at
01 · Zekai Price Ledger

Which Apollo.io alternatives are worth it in 2027?

The Apollo.io alternatives worth considering in 2027 are ZoomInfo for enterprise data, UpLead and Lusha for credit-based contact lookups, Cognism for mobile-verified data, Hunter for email finding, Clay for waterfall enrichment and Snov.io for finder plus outreach. Apollo.io is the only one here that also bundles email sequences by default.

ToolTypeStarting priceFree plan limitBest forCost for your teamChecked
Apollo.io logo
Apollo.ioThe tool you are replacing
You are here
$49/moBasic, monthly (from the pricing page's offer data; seat and annual basis not stated)
Gmail connections only; pooled credits Contact database with built-in email sequences — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
ZoomInfo logo
ZoomInfo Zekai score 8.5Best overall
Sold by quote only; no public price on zoominfo.com.Professional; no dollar price published (quote only)
No free plan Enterprise sales, marketing and talent data — 13 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
UpLead logo
UpLead Zekai score 8.3
$99/moEssentials, monthly ($74 billed yearly)
No free plan Pay-by-credit contact data with a short trial — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Lusha logo
Lusha Zekai score 6.8
Free
Free plan; paid price not publishedStarter, Pro and Premium set by a credit slider; prices not readable
40 credits a month Browser-extension contact lookups $0 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Cognism logo
Cognism Zekai score 8.0
Not checkedStandard and Pro; quote only
No free plan Seat-based data with intent and mobile verification — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Seamless.ai logo
Seamless.ai Zekai score 6.4
Not checkedFree trial and Seamless Pro; prices not readable
No free plan Real-time contact search with a free trial — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
LeadIQ logo
LeadIQ Zekai score 7.5
Free
Free plan; paid price not publishedPro from a credit selector; prices not readable
1 user, 50 credits Prospecting capture feeding your CRM $0 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Hunter logo
Hunter Zekai score 7.7Best free plan
Free plan + paid
$34/mo billed yearlyStarter, billed annually ($49 monthly)
50 credits, 1 email account a month Email finder and verifier on a free plan — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Clay logo
Clay Zekai score 9.1
Free plan + paid
$185/moLaunch, monthly ($167 billed yearly)
100 data credits, 500 actions a month Waterfall enrichment across many data providers — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
Snov.io logo
Snov.io Zekai score 7.6Cheapest paid
Free plan + paid
$39/moStarter, monthly ($29.25 billed yearly)
50 credits, 100 recipients a month Email finder with outreach on a free tier — 11 Nov 2026 Pricing ↗
OpenOutreach logo
OpenOutreach Zekai score 7.3Best open source
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (GPL-3.0) Self-hosted lead discovery from a product description $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (AGPL-3.0) Local business leads scraped from Google Maps $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (AGPL-3.0) Agent that finds, verifies and emails prospects $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗
Google Maps Scraper logo
Google Maps Scraper Zekai score 8.3
Open source
Free (self-hosted)
No limit, self-hosted (MIT) Free Google Maps business data and emails $0 14 Nov 2026 Code ↗

Every price was read on the vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. The Cost Finder assumes one entry plan per person, so it multiplies by your team size; yearly prices are shown per month, and team or business plans can cost more per seat. "Not checked" means we could not confirm a public price.

Price alert

Know first when Apollo.io or an alternative changes price

One email when a price or free plan on this page changes, plus The AI Briefing. Unsubscribe any time.

Alternatives Spotlight

Your tool here

One labelled card beside this table, outside the ranking.

Advertise here
For vendors

Is one of these tools yours?

Claim your listing to correct prices and free-plan limits.

Claim your tool
02 · Free plan

Is there a free version of Apollo.io?

Yes. Apollo.io has a Free plan for light use that connects Gmail accounts only, with credits pooled across the team and reset each billing cycle without rollover. The pricing page does not state a credit or send cap for the free plan, so check your account.

Source: Apollo.io pricing page, read 11 Nov 2026.

Free$0

Gmail connections only; pooled credits

Paid from$49/mo

Basic, monthly (from the pricing page's offer data; seat and annual basis not stated)

03 · Free alternatives

What are the best free Apollo.io alternatives?

The best free Apollo.io alternative is Hunter, whose free plan gives 50 credits a month, one connected email account and 500 recipients per sequence. Clay's free plan adds 100 data credits and 500 actions a month, and Lusha gives 40 credits. LeadIQ gives 50 credits for one user.

Lusha logo

Lusha

Free
40 credits a month
LeadIQ logo

LeadIQ

Free
1 user, 50 credits
Hunter logo

Hunter

Best free planFree plan + paid
50 credits, 1 email account a month
Paid from $34/mo billed yearly
Clay logo

Clay

Free plan + paid
100 data credits, 500 actions a month
Paid from $185/mo
Snov.io logo

Snov.io

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid
50 credits, 100 recipients a month
Paid from $39/mo
04 · Open source

What are the best open-source Apollo.io alternatives?

The open-source Apollo.io alternatives are OpenOutreach (GPL-3.0), Sellbird (AGPL-3.0), Prospex (AGPL-3.0) and Google Maps Scraper (MIT). Each finds leads you can contact, but none ships a contact database like Apollo's, so data quality depends on the sources and keys you connect, and you run the server yourself.

OpenOutreach logo

OpenOutreach

GPL-3.0★ 3.7k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Python command-line tool installed with uv; needs an LLM API key, a BetterContact key (free account has 40 credits) for lead and email lookup, and a mailbox app password.
Commercial use
Yes; GPL-3.0 means sharing source if you distribute a modified version.
Runs on
Any machine that runs Python with uv; a Docker image exists for servers.
Setup
Moderate · Needs an LLM key, a BetterContact key and a mailbox app password.
Last commit
13 Nov 2026
Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation) logo

Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation)

AGPL-3.0★ 244 GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Docker Compose for PostgreSQL 16 and Redis 7, Node.js 20 and pnpm 9 for development, and an OpenAI-compatible LLM (OpenAI, OpenRouter or local Ollama).
Commercial use
Yes; AGPL-3.0 means sharing changes if you run it as a service.
Runs on
Docker host for PostgreSQL 16 and Redis 7; an OpenAI-compatible LLM.
Setup
Moderate · Docker Compose for the databases, Node.js 20 and pnpm 9 to develop.
Last commit
5 Nov 2026
Sellbird (formerly Harvey) logo

Sellbird (formerly Harvey)

AGPL-3.0★ 5.4k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Python 3.11+ app on your own machine; thinks through the Claude Code or Codex CLI on your existing plan, and sends from a Gmail, Microsoft 365 or SMTP mailbox.
Commercial use
Yes; AGPL-3.0 means sharing changes if you run it as a service.
Runs on
Your own computer with Python 3.11 or newer; no GPU needed.
Setup
Moderate · Python install, a signed-in Claude or Codex CLI, and a sending mailbox.
Last commit
10 Nov 2026
Last release 6 Nov 2026
Google Maps Scraper logo

Google Maps Scraper

MIT★ 8k GitHub stars · 13 Nov 2026
To self-host: Run it with one Docker command or a downloaded binary; large crawls need more CPU and RAM and usually your own proxies to avoid blocks.
Commercial use
Yes (MIT).
Runs on
Docker or a prebuilt binary on Windows, macOS or Linux.
Setup
Easy · One docker run command, or download the binary and run it.
Last commit
8 Nov 2026
Last release 8 Nov 2026
05 · Side by side

How does Apollo.io compare with each alternative?

Apollo.io pools credits per team and bundles sequences with its database. ZoomInfo and Cognism sell by quote; UpLead and Lusha sell credit packs; Hunter and Snov.io centre on email finding; LeadIQ captures contacts into a CRM; Clay chains providers. Each card below states the specific difference.

01
ZoomInfo logo

Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo

Best overallSold by quote only; no public price on zoominfo.com.8.5
The differenceSells separate Sales, Marketing and Talent packages by quote only, with ABM Enterprise listing 150K included credits; the page publishes no dollar prices and shows no free plan.
Switch to ZoomInfo ifyou need enterprise-scale intent and ABM data across sales and marketing and will buy by quote
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want published self-serve prices and a free plan to start
Pros
  • Extensive and highly accurate B2B contact and company database.
  • AI surfaces high-value intent signals like tech changes and hiring surges.
Cons
  • Pricing is not public and is considered a premium investment.
  • The sheer volume of data and features can present a steep learning curve.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of ZoomInfo · Verdict: Premium B2B Intelligence Leader

02
UpLead logo

Apollo.io vs UpLead

$99/mo · checked 11 Nov 20268.3
The differencePlans are fixed credit packs, 170 a month on Essentials and 400 on Plus, with extra credits at $0.60 and $0.50; the trial gives 5 credits over 7 days.
Switch to UpLead ifyou want a small monthly credit pack and per-credit top-ups without a seat-based plan
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want email sequencing in the same product and a permanent free plan
Pros
  • Industry-leading 95% data accuracy guarantee reduces bounce rates.
  • Real-time verification ensures contact data is fresh when you need it.
Cons
  • Credit-based system can become costly for very high-volume prospecting.
  • Advanced features like Intent Data and API access are locked in the top-tier plan.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of UpLead · Verdict: High-Accuracy B2B Prospecting

03
Lusha logo

Apollo.io vs Lusha

FreeFree plan; paid price not published6.8
The differenceFree plan gives 40 credits a month, spending 1 per verified email and 5 per phone number; on monthly plans unused credits roll over up to twice the plan limit.
Switch to Lusha ifyou mostly look up individual emails and phone numbers from a browser extension
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want to build large lists and run sequences from one account
Pros
  • Provides verified B2B contact and company data.
  • Enriches CRM data and identifies buying signals.
Cons
  • No clear pricing information available on the pricing page.
  • Primarily focused on B2B data, may not suit other needs.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Lusha · Verdict: Contact vendor for info

04
Cognism logo

Apollo.io vs Cognism

Not checked8.0
The differenceSells Standard and Pro plans with 5 seats each by quote, where 1 credit reveals one contact; Pro adds intent data and on-demand mobile verification.
Switch to Cognism ifyou need verified mobile numbers and intent data and will negotiate a seat-based contract
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou prefer published prices and a free tier
Pros
  • Specializes in high-quality, compliant European B2B data.
  • Phone-verified mobiles can lead to up to 3x higher connect rates.
Cons
  • Pricing is not public and requires engaging with sales for a custom quote.
  • Optimized for teams of 5+ salespeople, potentially making it a high investment for smaller teams.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Cognism · Verdict: Premium European B2B Data.

05
Seamless.ai logo

Apollo.io vs Seamless.ai

Not checked6.4
The differenceOffers a free trial and one paid tier, Seamless Pro, per its pricing page description; plan details load only in the browser, so limits are not readable here.
Switch to Seamless.ai ifyou want a trial-first search tool with a single paid tier to keep things simple
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want a documented free plan and sequencing built in
Pros
  • Real-time data search ensures higher accuracy than static databases.
  • Generous free tier with 50 credits to test the platform.
Cons
  • Full pricing for paid plans is not public and requires a sales demo.
  • The wide range of features can present a learning curve for new users.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Seamless.ai · Verdict: Real-time lead engine.

06
LeadIQ logo

Apollo.io vs LeadIQ

FreeFree plan; paid price not published7.5
The differenceFree plan is limited to 1 user and 50 credits; Pro is bought through a credit selector with a 25% annual discount and Enterprise lists up to 5 users.
Switch to LeadIQ ifyou capture contacts while browsing and push them into your CRM rather than run sequences
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want a bigger free pool and email sequences in the same tool
Pros
  • Saves hundreds of hours per quarter on manual prospecting
  • Proven ROI with case studies showing millions in generated pipeline
Cons
  • Pricing is transparent with clear plans available on the website.
  • Contact data accuracy is high but not always 100% perfect

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of LeadIQ · Verdict: Efficient Prospecting, Integrated Workflow

07
Hunter logo

Apollo.io vs Hunter

Best free planFree plan + paid$34/mo billed yearly · checked 11 Nov 20267.7
The differenceFree plan gives 50 credits a month, 1 connected email account and 500 recipients per sequence; Starter raises credits to 2,000 a month.
Switch to Hunter ifyou mainly need to find and verify emails and want a usable free plan
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou need phone numbers, a large filterable database and call recording
Pros
  • All-in-one platform for finding, verifying, and outreach
  • High accuracy in email finding and verification
Cons
  • Credit-based system can become costly for high-volume teams
  • Free plan has tight limits (50 credits/month)

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Hunter · Verdict: Find emails, send outreach.

08
Clay logo

Apollo.io vs Clay

Free plan + paid$185/mo · checked 11 Nov 20269.1
The differenceRuns lookups through multiple data providers in sequence and lets you bring your own API keys; the free plan caps tables at 200 rows and has no phone enrichment.
Switch to Clay ifyou want to chain several data providers and your own keys into one enrichment table
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want one built-in database and sequencing without assembling providers
Pros
  • Combines 200+ data providers, reducing reliance on a single source.
  • AI Claygents automate deep research tasks previously done manually.
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve compared to all-in-one lead gen tools.
  • Credit-based pricing can be unpredictable for heavy usage.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Clay · Verdict: Powerful GTM Automation

09
Snov.io logo

Apollo.io vs Snov.io

Cheapest paidFree plan + paid$39/mo · checked 11 Nov 20267.6
The differenceStarter gives 1,000 credits and 5,000 recipients a month; the renewing Trial plan gives 50 credits and lacks bulk search, export and API access.
Switch to Snov.io ifyou want a smaller email finder plus outreach with credits and recipients priced together
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou need a phone-number and filter-rich contact database as the main product
Pros
  • All-in-one platform combines multiple sales tools into one workflow.
  • Strong LinkedIn integration for sourcing high-quality leads.
Cons
  • LinkedIn automation is a separate paid add-on, not included in base plan pricing.
  • The sheer number of features can be overwhelming for new users.

Pros and cons from the Zekai review of Snov.io · Verdict: Unified Sales Outreach Platform

10
OpenOutreach logo

Apollo.io vs OpenOutreach

Best open sourceOpen sourceFree (self-hosted)7.3
The differenceBuilds a list from your product description and has an LLM judge each candidate against your ideal customer profile with written reasons; it holds no database and relies on BetterContact for lookups.
Switch to OpenOutreach ifyou want AI-qualified lead discovery you control and can run from a command line
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou need a large owned database with filters, exports and team seats
11
Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation) logo

Apollo.io vs Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation)

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)6.6
The differenceScrapes Google Maps for local businesses, scores leads with an LLM and drafts outreach for email, WhatsApp, Instagram and LinkedIn, so it suits local-business lists rather than B2B job titles.
Switch to Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation) ifyou target local businesses and want to scrape and score them on your own server
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou target job titles at B2B companies and need verified contact data
12
Sellbird (formerly Harvey) logo

Apollo.io vs Sellbird (formerly Harvey)

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)7.5
The differenceFinds local businesses free on OpenStreetMap, reads each company's own website for buying signals, verifies one email per contact and only sends to deliverable addresses after your approval.
Switch to Sellbird (formerly Harvey) ifyou sell to local businesses and want signal-based prospecting with every send approved by you
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou want a shared team database and sequences without running Python yourself
13
Google Maps Scraper logo

Apollo.io vs Google Maps Scraper

Open sourceFree (self-hosted)8.3
The differenceExtracts name, address, phone, website, rating, reviews and emails for Google Maps places into CSV or JSON through a CLI, web UI or REST API; it is a scraper, not a contact database.
Switch to Google Maps Scraper ifyou only need business details and emails from Google Maps and can run a Docker command
Stay with Apollo.io ifyou need job titles, direct dials and filters across a B2B people database
06 · What changed

Why do people leave Apollo.io?

  • Apollo's pricing FAQ says credits are pooled across the team, granted at the start of each billing cycle and expire unused, including purchased add-on credits. (source)

  • Apollo's plans carry record selection limits: without one you can export up to 10,000 leads in one click, while lower plans require smaller batches. (source)

  • Apollo states its plans are for internal business use only; using its data to power external products or resale needs a separate custom-priced agreement. (source)

08 · FAQ

Questions people ask about Apollo.io alternatives

What is the best alternative to Apollo.io in 2027?

ZoomInfo is the best overall Apollo.io alternative on this page (Sold by quote only; no public price on zoominfo.com.). For no cost, Hunter has a free plan (50 credits, 1 email account a month). To self-host, OpenOutreach is open source (GPL-3.0).

Is there a free version of Apollo.io?

Yes. Apollo.io has a free plan: Gmail connections only; pooled credits. Paid plans start at $49/mo, checked on 11 Nov 2026.

Is there a 100% free alternative to Apollo.io?

Yes. OpenOutreach, Prospex (business-leads-ai-automation), Sellbird (formerly Harvey), Google Maps Scraper are open source and free to self-host. Lusha, LeadIQ, Hunter, Clay, Snov.io have a free plan with limits, shown in the table.

What is cheaper than Apollo.io?

Snov.io starts at $39/mo, against $49/mo for Apollo.io, as listed on each vendor's pricing page on 11 Nov 2026.

How much do Apollo.io alternatives cost for a team of 5?

If each of 5 people buys the entry paid plan, at the prices Zekai checked on 13 Nov 2026, the monthly cost is Hunter $170/mo, Snov.io $195/mo, UpLead $495/mo, against Apollo.io $245/mo for Apollo.io. Team and business plans can cost more per seat. The Zekai Cost Finder on this page recalculates for any team size.

Which is better, ZoomInfo or Apollo.io?

Sells separate Sales, Marketing and Talent packages by quote only, with ABM Enterprise listing 150K included credits; the page publishes no dollar prices and shows no free plan. Choose ZoomInfo if you need enterprise-scale intent and ABM data across sales and marketing and will buy by quote. Stay with Apollo.io if you want published self-serve prices and a free plan to start.

Why are people leaving Apollo.io?

The documented reasons are: Apollo's pricing FAQ says credits are pooled across the team, granted at the start of each billing cycle and expire unused, including purchased add-on credits (11 Nov 2026); Apollo's plans carry record selection limits: without one you can export up to 10,000 leads in one click, while lower plans require smaller batches (11 Nov 2026). Each is sourced in the section above.

What is better than Apollo.io?

ZoomInfo and Cognism go further on enterprise and mobile-verified data but are sold by quote. Hunter and Snov.io are simpler for email finding, and Clay suits chained enrichment. Apollo.io stays ahead when you want a database and sequences in one subscription.

09 · Method

How did Zekai check this page?

Zekai independently reviews AI tools. For this page we read each vendor's own pricing and product pages and recorded the starting price, the free-plan limit and the date of the check. Only tools that do the same job as Apollo.io are listed, and sponsors never change the order or the scores.

1 · Same job onlyEvery alternative does the same task as Apollo.io; tools for other jobs are left out.
2 · Vendor pages onlyPrices and free limits come from each vendor's own pricing page, never from blogs.
Zekai score0–10, from four published weights: ease 25%, output quality 30%, value 20%, time saved 25%. How we score
3 · Re-checkedA price older than 35 days is re-read or the page falls back to an older version.
Change log
  • Page rebuilt on v6; all prices re-read on vendor pages.

  • Missing prices re-read on vendor pages.

  • Open-source options expanded; each now shows licence, commercial use, hardware and setup.

Get paid to train AI →

See Zekai first in Google